| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit a06393ed03167771246c4c43192d9c264bc48412 upstream.
When removing a bcm tx operation either a hrtimer or a tasklet might run.
As the hrtimer triggers its associated tasklet and vice versa we need to
take care to mutually terminate both handlers.
Reported-by: Michael Josenhans <michael.josenhans@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Tested-by: Michael Josenhans <michael.josenhans@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 332b05ca7a438f857c61a3c21a88489a21532364 upstream.
This patch adds a check to limit the number of can_filters that can be
set via setsockopt on CAN_RAW sockets. Otherwise allocations > MAX_ORDER
are not prevented resulting in a warning.
Reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/2/230
Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit f1712c73714088a7252d276a57126d56c7d37e64 upstream.
Zhang Yanmin reported crashes [1] and provided a patch adding a
synchronize_rcu() call in can_rx_unregister()
The main problem seems that the sockets themselves are not RCU
protected.
If CAN uses RCU for delivery, then sockets should be freed only after
one RCU grace period.
Recent kernels could use sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_RCU_FREE), but let's
ease stable backports with the following fix instead.
[1]
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<ffffffff81495e25>] selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x65/0x2a0
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffff81485d8c>] security_sock_rcv_skb+0x4c/0x60
[<ffffffff81d55771>] sk_filter+0x41/0x210
[<ffffffff81d12913>] sock_queue_rcv_skb+0x53/0x3a0
[<ffffffff81f0a2b3>] raw_rcv+0x2a3/0x3c0
[<ffffffff81f06eab>] can_rcv_filter+0x12b/0x370
[<ffffffff81f07af9>] can_receive+0xd9/0x120
[<ffffffff81f07beb>] can_rcv+0xab/0x100
[<ffffffff81d362ac>] __netif_receive_skb_core+0xd8c/0x11f0
[<ffffffff81d36734>] __netif_receive_skb+0x24/0xb0
[<ffffffff81d37f67>] process_backlog+0x127/0x280
[<ffffffff81d36f7b>] net_rx_action+0x33b/0x4f0
[<ffffffff810c88d4>] __do_softirq+0x184/0x440
[<ffffffff81f9e86c>] do_softirq_own_stack+0x1c/0x30
<EOI>
[<ffffffff810c76fb>] do_softirq.part.18+0x3b/0x40
[<ffffffff810c8bed>] do_softirq+0x1d/0x20
[<ffffffff81d30085>] netif_rx_ni+0xe5/0x110
[<ffffffff8199cc87>] slcan_receive_buf+0x507/0x520
[<ffffffff8167ef7c>] flush_to_ldisc+0x21c/0x230
[<ffffffff810e3baf>] process_one_work+0x24f/0x670
[<ffffffff810e44ed>] worker_thread+0x9d/0x6f0
[<ffffffff810e4450>] ? rescuer_thread+0x480/0x480
[<ffffffff810ebafc>] kthread+0x12c/0x150
[<ffffffff81f9ccef>] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
Reported-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit deb507f91f1adbf64317ad24ac46c56eeccfb754 upstream.
Andrey Konovalov reported an issue with proc_register in bcm.c.
As suggested by Cong Wang this patch adds a lock_sock() protection and
a check for unsuccessful proc_create_data() in bcm_connect().
Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=147732648731237
Reported-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Suggested-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Acked-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
