| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 8bc1379b82b8e809eef77a9fedbb75c6c297be19 upstream.
Use a separate journal transaction if it turns out that we need to
convert an inline file to use an data block. Otherwise we could end
up failing due to not having journal credits.
This addresses CVE-2018-10883.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200071
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 8cdb5240ec5928b20490a2bb34cb87e9a5f40226 upstream.
When expanding the extra isize space, we must never move the
system.data xattr out of the inode body. For performance reasons, it
doesn't make any sense, and the inline data implementation assumes
that system.data xattr is never in the external xattr block.
This addresses CVE-2018-10880
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200005
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 513f86d73855ce556ea9522b6bfd79f87356dc3a upstream.
If there an inode points to a block which is also some other type of
metadata block (such as a block allocation bitmap), the
buffer_verified flag can be set when it was validated as that other
metadata block type; however, it would make a really terrible external
attribute block. The reason why we use the verified flag is to avoid
constantly reverifying the block. However, it doesn't take much
overhead to make sure the magic number of the xattr block is correct,
and this will avoid potential crashes.
This addresses CVE-2018-10879.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200001
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[ghackmann@google.com: 3.18 backport: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 5369a762c882c0b6e9599e4ebbb3a9ba9eee7e2d upstream.
In theory this should have been caught earlier when the xattr list was
verified, but in case it got missed, it's simple enough to add check
to make sure we don't overrun the xattr buffer.
This addresses CVE-2018-10879.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200001
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- Add inode parameter to ext4_xattr_set_entry() and update callers
- Return -EIO instead of -EFSCORRUPTED on error
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 6bdc9977fcdedf47118d2caf7270a19f4b6d8a8f upstream.
Fixes: 3f2571c1f91f ("ext4: factor out xattr moving")
Fixes: 6dd4ee7cab7e ("ext4: Expand extra_inodes space per ...")
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.23
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 45ae932d246f721e6584430017176cbcadfde610 upstream.
bs.bh was taken in previous ext4_xattr_block_find() call,
it should be released before re-using
Fixes: 7e01c8e5420b ("ext3/4: fix uninitialized bs in ...")
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.26
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The conversion is generally straightforward. The only tricky part is
that xattr block corresponding to found mbcache entry can get freed
before we get buffer lock for that block. So we have to check whether
the entry is still valid after getting buffer lock.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Joe Maples <joe@frap129.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we don't support xattrs with e_value_block set. We don't allow
them to pass initial xattr check so there's no point for checking for
this later. Since these tests were untested, bugs were creeping in and
not all places which should have checked were checking e_value_block
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Joe Maples <joe@frap129.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently we don't support xattrs with values stored out of line. Check
for that in ext4_xattr_check_names() to make sure we never work with
such xattrs since not all the code counts with that resulting is possible
weird corruption issues.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Joe Maples <joe@frap129.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The xattr_sem deadlock problems fixed in commit 2e81a4eeedca: "ext4:
avoid deadlock when expanding inode size" didn't include the use of
xattr_sem in fs/ext4/inline.c. With the addition of project quota
which added a new extra inode field, this exposed deadlocks in the
inline_data code similar to the ones fixed by 2e81a4eeedca.
The deadlock can be reproduced via:
dmesg -n 7
mke2fs -t ext4 -O inline_data -Fq -I 256 /dev/vdc 32768
mount -t ext4 -o debug_want_extra_isize=24 /dev/vdc /vdc
mkdir /vdc/a
umount /vdc
mount -t ext4 /dev/vdc /vdc
echo foo > /vdc/a/foo
and looks like this:
[ 11.158815]
[ 11.160276] =============================================
[ 11.161960] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 11.161960] 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160 Tainted: G W
[ 11.161960] ---------------------------------------------
[ 11.161960] bash/2519 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1225a4b>] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] but task is already holding lock:
[ 11.161960] (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 11.161960] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] CPU0
[ 11.161960] ----
[ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
[ 11.161960] lock(&ei->xattr_sem);
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] 4 locks held by bash/2519:
[ 11.161960] #0: (sb_writers#3){.+.+.+}, at: [<c11a2414>] mnt_want_write+0x1e/0x3e
[ 11.161960] #1: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key){++++++}, at: [<c119508b>] path_openat+0x338/0x67a
[ 11.161960] #2: (jbd2_handle){++++..}, at: [<c123314a>] start_this_handle+0x582/0x622
[ 11.161960] #3: (&ei->xattr_sem){++++..}, at: [<c1227941>] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x3a/0x152
[ 11.161960]
[ 11.161960] stack backtrace:
[ 11.161960] CPU: 0 PID: 2519 Comm: bash Tainted: G W 4.10.0-rc3-00015-g011b30a8a3cf #160
[ 11.161960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014
[ 11.161960] Call Trace:
[ 11.161960] dump_stack+0x72/0xa3
[ 11.161960] __lock_acquire+0xb7c/0xcb9
[ 11.161960] ? kvm_clock_read+0x1f/0x29
[ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66
[ 11.161960] ? __lock_is_held+0x36/0x66
[ 11.161960] lock_acquire+0x106/0x18a
[ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[ 11.161960] down_write+0x39/0x72
[ 11.161960] ? ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[ 11.161960] ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea+0x3d/0x4cd
[ 11.161960] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x22/0x2c
[ 11.161960] ? jbd2_journal_extend+0x1e2/0x262
[ 11.161960] ? __ext4_journal_get_write_access+0x3d/0x60
[ 11.161960] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x17d/0x26d
[ 11.161960] ? ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2
[ 11.161960] ext4_add_dirent_to_inline.isra.12+0xa5/0xb2
[ 11.161960] ext4_try_add_inline_entry+0x69/0x152
[ 11.161960] ext4_add_entry+0xa3/0x848
[ 11.161960] ? __brelse+0x14/0x2f
[ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x4f
[ 11.161960] ext4_add_nondir+0x17/0x5b
[ 11.161960] ext4_create+0xcf/0x133
[ 11.161960] ? ext4_mknod+0x12f/0x12f
[ 11.161960] lookup_open+0x39e/0x3fb
[ 11.161960] ? __wake_up+0x1a/0x40
[ 11.161960] ? lock_acquire+0x11e/0x18a
[ 11.161960] path_openat+0x35c/0x67a
[ 11.161960] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xd7/0xf2
[ 11.161960] do_filp_open+0x36/0x7c
[ 11.161960] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x22/0x2c
[ 11.161960] ? __alloc_fd+0x169/0x173
[ 11.161960] do_sys_open+0x59/0xcc
[ 11.161960] SyS_open+0x1d/0x1f
[ 11.161960] do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61
[ 11.161960] entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f
[ 11.161960] EIP: 0xb76ad469
[ 11.161960] EFLAGS: 00000286 CPU: 0
[ 11.161960] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08168ac8 ECX: 00008241 EDX: 000001b6
[ 11.161960] ESI: b75e46bc EDI: b7755000 EBP: bfbdb108 ESP: bfbdafc0
[ 11.161960] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.10 (requires 2e81a4eeedca as a prereq)
Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Joe Maples <joe@frap129.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 2e81a4eeedcaa66e35f58b81e0755b87057ce392 upstream.
When we need to move xattrs into external xattr block, we call
ext4_xattr_block_set() from ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea(). That may end
up calling ext4_mark_inode_dirty() again which will recurse back into
the inode expansion code leading to deadlocks.
Protect from recursion using EXT4_STATE_NO_EXPAND inode flag and move
its management into ext4_expand_extra_isize_ea() since its manipulation
is safe there (due to xattr_sem) from possible races with
ext4_xattr_set_handle() which plays with it as well.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit dac7a4b4b1f664934e8b713f529b629f67db313c upstream.
We must lock the xattr block before calculating or verifying the
checksum in order to avoid spurious checksum failures.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=193661
Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit b47820edd1634dc1208f9212b7ecfb4230610a23 upstream.
We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of
metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this
without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are
being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged.
In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata
checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the
checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We aren't checking to see if the in-inode extended attribute is
corrupted before we try to expand the inode's extra isize fields.
This can lead to potential crashes caused by the BUG_ON() check in
ext4_xattr_shift_entries().
Upstream commit: 9e92f48c34eb2b9af9d12f892e2fe1fce5e8ce35
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Change-Id: Idd5c5eaaaf7e244e3d310fc528840c13ce4c44a4
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 9e92f48c34eb2b9af9d12f892e2fe1fce5e8ce35 upstream.
We aren't checking to see if the in-inode extended attribute is
corrupted before we try to expand the inode's extra isize fields.
This can lead to potential crashes caused by the BUG_ON() check in
ext4_xattr_shift_entries().
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit b47820edd1634dc1208f9212b7ecfb4230610a23 upstream.
We temporally change checksum fields in buffers of some types of
metadata into '0' for verifying the checksum values. By doing this
without locking the buffer, some metadata's checksums, which are
being committed or written back to the storage, could be damaged.
In our test, several metadata blocks were found with damaged metadata
checksum value during recovery process. When we only verify the
checksum value, we have to avoid modifying checksum fields directly.
Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daeho.jeong@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Youngjin Gil <youngjin.gil@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|