| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 8844618d8aa7a9973e7b527d038a2a589665002c upstream.
The bg_flags field in the block group descripts is only valid if the
uninit_bg or metadata_csum feature is enabled. We were not
consistently looking at this field; fix this.
Also block group #0 must never have uninitialized allocation bitmaps,
or need to be zeroed, since that's where the root inode, and other
special inodes are set up. Check for these conditions and mark the
file system as corrupted if they are detected.
This addresses CVE-2018-10876.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199403
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() and ext4_read_inode_bitmap() return
a pointer (NULL on error) instead of an error code
- Open-code sb_rdonly()
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
[ghackmann@google.com: forward-port to 3.18: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows us to refactor the procfs code, which saves a bit of
compiled space. More importantly it isolates most of the procfs
support code into a single file, so it's easier to #ifdef it out if
the proc file system has been disabled.
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Joe Maples <joe@frap129.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
After commit 62d1034f53e3 ("fortify: use WARN instead of BUG for now"),
we get a warning about possible stack overflow from a memcpy that
was not strictly bounded to the size of the local variable:
inlined from 'ext4_mb_seq_groups_show' at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2322:2:
include/linux/string.h:309:9: error: '__builtin_memcpy': writing between 161 and 1116 bytes into a region of size 160 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
We actually had a bug here that would have been found by the warning,
but it was already fixed last year in commit 30a9d7afe70e ("ext4: fix
stack memory corruption with 64k block size").
This replaces the fixed-length structure on the stack with a variable-length
structure, using the correct upper bound that tells the compiler that
everything is really fine here. I also change the loop count to check
for the same upper bound for consistency, but the existing code is
already correct here.
Note that while clang won't allow certain kinds of variable-length arrays
in structures, this particular instance is fine, as the array is at the
end of the structure, and the size is strictly bounded.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit cd648b8a8fd5071d232242d5ee7ee3c0815776af upstream.
If filesystem groups are artifically small (using parameter -g to
mkfs.ext4), ext4_mb_normalize_request() can result in a request that is
larger than a block group. Trim the request size to not confuse
allocation code.
Reported-by: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit adb7ef600cc9d9d15ecc934cc26af5c1379777df upstream.
This might be unexpected but pages allocated for sbi->s_buddy_cache are
charged to current memory cgroup. So, GFP_NOFS allocation could fail if
current task has been killed by OOM or if current memory cgroup has no
free memory left. Block allocator cannot handle such failures here yet.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[ Upstream commit 69e43e8cc971a79dd1ee5d4343d8e63f82725123 ]
'border' variable is set to a value of 2 times the block size of the
underlying filesystem. With 64k block size, the resulting value won't
fit into a 16-bit variable. Hence this commit changes the data type of
'border' to 'unsigned int'.
Fixes: c9de560ded61f
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
[ Upstream commit 30a9d7afe70ed6bd9191d3000e2ef1a34fb58493 ]
The number of 'counters' elements needed in 'struct sg' is
super_block->s_blocksize_bits + 2. Presently we have 16 'counters'
elements in the array. This is insufficient for block sizes >= 32k. In
such cases the memcpy operation performed in ext4_mb_seq_groups_show()
would cause stack memory corruption.
Fixes: c9de560ded61f
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 554a5ccc4e4a20c5f3ec859de0842db4b4b9c77e upstream.
If we hit this error when mounted with errors=continue or
errors=remount-ro:
EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_mb_mark_diskspace_used:2940: comm ext4.exe: Allocating blocks 5090-6081 which overlap fs metadata
then ext4_mb_new_blocks() will call ext4_mb_release_context() and try to
continue. However, ext4_mb_release_context() is the wrong thing to call
here since we are still actually using the allocation context.
Instead, just error out. We could retry the allocation, but there is a
possibility of getting stuck in an infinite loop instead, so this seems
safer.
[ Fixed up so we don't return EAGAIN to userspace. --tytso ]
Fixes: 8556e8f3b6 ("ext4: Don't allow new groups to be added during block allocation")
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
[wt: 3.10 doesn't have EFSCORRUPTED, but XFS uses EUCLEAN as does 3.14
on this patch so use this instead]
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 935244cd54b86ca46e69bc6604d2adfb1aec2d42 upstream.
Currently, in ext4_mb_init(), there's a loop like the following:
do {
...
offset += 1 << (sb->s_blocksize_bits - i);
i++;
} while (i <= sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1);
Note that the updated offset is used in the loop's next iteration only.
However, at the last iteration, that is at i == sb->s_blocksize_bits + 1,
the shift count becomes equal to (unsigned)-1 > 31 (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3))
and UBSAN reports
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2621:15
shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 32-bit type 'int'
[...]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff818c4d25>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117
[<ffffffff818c4c69>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169
[<ffffffff819411ab>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
[<ffffffff81941cac>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254
[<ffffffff81941ab1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158
[<ffffffff814b6dc1>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x101/0x390
[<ffffffff816fc13b>] ? ext4_mb_init+0x13b/0xfd0
[<ffffffff814293c7>] ? create_cache+0x57/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8142948a>] ? create_cache+0x11a/0x1f0
[<ffffffff821c2168>] ? mutex_lock+0x38/0x60
[<ffffffff821c23ab>] ? mutex_unlock+0x1b/0x50
[<ffffffff814c26ab>] ? put_online_mems+0x5b/0xc0
[<ffffffff81429677>] ? kmem_cache_create+0x117/0x2c0
[<ffffffff816fcc49>] ext4_mb_init+0xc49/0xfd0
[...]
Observe that the mentioned shift exponent, 4294967295, equals (unsigned)-1.
Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least
GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the
such calculated value of offset is never used again.
Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, offset_incr, holding the
next increment to apply to offset and adjust that one by right shifting it
by one position per loop iteration.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit b5cb316cdf3a3f5f6125412b0f6065185240cfdc upstream.
Currently, in mb_find_order_for_block(), there's a loop like the following:
while (order <= e4b->bd_blkbits + 1) {
...
bb += 1 << (e4b->bd_blkbits - order);
}
Note that the updated bb is used in the loop's next iteration only.
However, at the last iteration, that is at order == e4b->bd_blkbits + 1,
the shift count becomes negative (c.f. C99 6.5.7(3)) and UBSAN reports
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1281:11
shift exponent -1 is negative
[...]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff818c4d35>] dump_stack+0xbc/0x117
[<ffffffff818c4c79>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x169/0x169
[<ffffffff819411bb>] ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
[<ffffffff81941cbc>] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1fb/0x254
[<ffffffff81941ac1>] ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x158/0x158
[<ffffffff816e93a0>] ? ext4_mb_generate_from_pa+0x590/0x590
[<ffffffff816502c8>] ? ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait+0x598/0xe80
[<ffffffff816e7b7e>] mb_find_order_for_block+0x1ce/0x240
[...]
Unless compilers start to do some fancy transformations (which at least
GCC 6.0.0 doesn't currently do), the issue is of cosmetic nature only: the
such calculated value of bb is never used again.
Silence UBSAN by introducing another variable, bb_incr, holding the next
increment to apply to bb and adjust that one by right shifting it by one
position per loop iteration.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114701
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112161
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 7444a072c387a93ebee7066e8aee776954ab0e41 upstream.
ext4_free_blocks is looping around the allocation request and mimics
__GFP_NOFAIL behavior without any allocation fallback strategy. Let's
remove the open coded loop and replace it with __GFP_NOFAIL. Without the
flag the allocator has no way to find out never-fail requirement and
cannot help in any way.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(This is a re-application of commit
687f999e1fbd3b553bccbd7f52996ae56c5e327e applied to the ext4 file
system code as of 3.18.)
* What
This provides an interface for issuing an FITRIM which uses the
secure discard instead of just a discard.
Only the eMMC command is "secure", and not how the FS uses it:
due to the fact that the FS might reassign a region somewhere else,
the original deleted data will not be affected by the "trim" which only
handles un-used regions.
So we'll just call it "deep discard", and note that this is a
"best effort" cleanup.
* Why
Once in a while, We want to be able to cleanup most of the unused blocks
after erasing a bunch of files.
We don't want to constantly secure-discard via a mount option.
From an eMMC spec perspective, it tells the device to really get rid of
all the data for the specified blocks and not just put them back into the
pool of free ones (unlike the normal TRIM). The eMMC spec says the
secure trim handling must make sure the data (and metadata) is not available
anymore. A simple TRIM doesn't clear the data, it just puts blocks in the
free pool.
JEDEC Standard No. 84-A441
7.6.9 Secure Erase
7.6.10 Secure Trim
From an FS perspective, it is acceptable to leave some data behind.
- directory entries related to deleted files
- databases entries related to deleted files
- small-file data stored in inode extents
- blocks held by the FS waiting to be re-used (mitigated by sync).
- blocks reassigned by the FS prior to FIDTRIM.
Change-Id: I687f999e1fbd3b553bccbd7f52996ae56c5e327e
Signed-off-by: Geremy Condra <gcondra@google.com>
Signed-off-by: JP Abgrall <jpa@google.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit adb7ef600cc9d9d15ecc934cc26af5c1379777df upstream.
This might be unexpected but pages allocated for sbi->s_buddy_cache are
charged to current memory cgroup. So, GFP_NOFS allocation could fail if
current task has been killed by OOM or if current memory cgroup has no
free memory left. Block allocator cannot handle such failures here yet.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 7444a072c387a93ebee7066e8aee776954ab0e41 upstream.
ext4_free_blocks is looping around the allocation request and mimics
__GFP_NOFAIL behavior without any allocation fallback strategy. Let's
remove the open coded loop and replace it with __GFP_NOFAIL. Without the
flag the allocator has no way to find out never-fail requirement and
cannot help in any way.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Guendhoer <stefan@guendhoer.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
