diff options
| author | Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com> | 2014-07-01 18:40:20 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mister Oyster <oysterized@gmail.com> | 2017-04-11 10:59:07 +0200 |
| commit | 06985e882dcc1795b38b84f02e6594ba7a6283de (patch) | |
| tree | 1b250f95a1cfb01f83d185a9438046739c75182e /net/bluetooth/smp.c | |
| parent | 0534820c5afc3ee31f58812d7656776bdb6e375c (diff) | |
Bluetooth: Fix redundant encryption when receiving Security Request
If we're already encrypted with a good enough LTK we should just ignore
an incoming SMP Security Request. The code was already taking care of
this in the smp_conn_security function before calling smp_ltk_encrypt
but failed to do the same in smp_cmd_security_req. This patch fixes the
issue by moving up the smp_sufficient_security function and using it in
the Security Request handler before trying to request encryption.
Signed-off-by: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Rupesh Tatiya <rtatiya@codeaurora.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bluetooth/smp.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | net/bluetooth/smp.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/smp.c b/net/bluetooth/smp.c index b5562abdd..c58e2757d 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/smp.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/smp.c @@ -730,16 +730,36 @@ static u8 smp_ltk_encrypt(struct l2cap_conn *conn, u8 sec_level) return 1; } +bool smp_sufficient_security(struct hci_conn *hcon, u8 sec_level) +{ + if (sec_level == BT_SECURITY_LOW) { + BT_INFO("TRUE:(sec_level == BT_SECURITY_LOW)"); + return true; + } + if (hcon->sec_level >= sec_level) { + BT_INFO("TRUE:(hcon->sec_level >= sec_level)"); + return true; + } + BT_INFO("return false"); + return false; +} + static u8 smp_cmd_security_req(struct l2cap_conn *conn, struct sk_buff *skb) { struct smp_cmd_security_req *rp = (void *) skb->data; struct smp_cmd_pairing cp; struct hci_conn *hcon = conn->hcon; struct smp_chan *smp; + u8 sec_level; BT_DBG("conn %p", conn); - hcon->pending_sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req); + sec_level = authreq_to_seclevel(rp->auth_req); + if (smp_sufficient_security(hcon, sec_level)) + return 0; + + if (sec_level > hcon->pending_sec_level) + hcon->pending_sec_level = sec_level; if (smp_ltk_encrypt(conn, hcon->pending_sec_level)) return 0; |
