diff options
| author | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> | 2014-06-04 16:06:37 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Moyster <oysterized@gmail.com> | 2016-09-28 15:14:13 +0200 |
| commit | a5f35c31ae289e27e6f77b22668dee7ab5cefeea (patch) | |
| tree | 0caa24f4ae6da0da6344901432b5028d42d4d9e3 /mm | |
| parent | 4b4c2d3bb5c9ff680103500f6ca1d796f050e0f4 (diff) | |
mm: slub: fix ALLOC_SLOWPATH stat
There used to be only one path out of __slab_alloc(), and ALLOC_SLOWPATH
got bumped in that exit path. Now there are two, and a bunch of gotos.
ALLOC_SLOWPATH can now get set more than once during a single call to
__slab_alloc() which is pretty bogus. Here's the sequence:
1. Enter __slab_alloc(), fall through all the way to the
stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH);
2. hit 'if (!freelist)', and bump DEACTIVATE_BYPASS, jump to
new_slab (goto #1)
3. Hit 'if (c->partial)', bump CPU_PARTIAL_ALLOC, goto redo
(goto #2)
4. Fall through in the same path we did before all the way to
stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH)
5. bump ALLOC_REFILL stat, then return
Doing this is obviously bogus. It keeps us from being able to
accurately compare ALLOC_SLOWPATH vs. ALLOC_FASTPATH. It also means
that the total number of allocs always exceeds the total number of
frees.
This patch moves stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH) to be called from the same
place that __slab_alloc() is. This makes it much less likely that
ALLOC_SLOWPATH will get botched again in the spaghetti-code inside
__slab_alloc().
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: W4TCH0UT <ateekujjawal@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/slub.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 5 deletions
@@ -2458,8 +2458,6 @@ redo: if (freelist) goto load_freelist; - stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH); - freelist = get_freelist(s, page); if (!freelist) { @@ -2573,10 +2571,10 @@ redo: object = c->freelist; page = c->page; - if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) + if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(page, node))) { object = __slab_alloc(s, gfpflags, node, addr, c); - - else { + stat(s, ALLOC_SLOWPATH); + } else { void *next_object = get_freepointer_safe(s, object); /* |
