From 7729fa4a4727c724df9e31cc524334f0629c558b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Lainé <jeremy.laine@m4x.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:04:12 +0000
Subject: RPC: splitting methodName should not be done at the QXmppRpcIq level,
 it is perfectly legitimate to not use the INTERFACE.METHOD convention in a
 Jabber-RPC IQ

---
 example/tests/tests.cpp | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'example/tests/tests.cpp')

diff --git a/example/tests/tests.cpp b/example/tests/tests.cpp
index 1da51be5..922bf23b 100644
--- a/example/tests/tests.cpp
+++ b/example/tests/tests.cpp
@@ -437,8 +437,7 @@ void TestXmlRpc::testInvoke()
 
     QXmppRpcInvokeIq iq;
     parsePacket(iq, xml);
-    QCOMPARE(iq.interface(), QLatin1String("examples"));
-    QCOMPARE(iq.method(), QLatin1String("getStateName"));
+    QCOMPARE(iq.method(), QLatin1String("examples.getStateName"));
     QCOMPARE(iq.arguments(), QVariantList() << int(6));
     serializePacket(iq, xml);
 }
-- 
cgit v1.2.3