From fe888e1ae7a0647a692b6dc3f6b0be5b06dc8d06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Wagner Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:09:05 -0500 Subject: Update URL of polyfill repo to polyfill-prototype-1 --- BinaryEncoding.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'BinaryEncoding.md') diff --git a/BinaryEncoding.md b/BinaryEncoding.md index d2f8fca..00d0cc9 100644 --- a/BinaryEncoding.md +++ b/BinaryEncoding.md @@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ Yes: * Large reductions in payload size can still significantly decrease the compressed file size. * Experimental results from a - [polyfill prototype](https://github.com/WebAssembly/polyfill) show the + [polyfill prototype](https://github.com/WebAssembly/polyfill-prototype-1) show the gzipped binary format to be about 20-30% smaller than the corresponding gzipped asm.js. * A binary format that represents the names of variables and functions with raw indices instead of strings is much faster to decode: array indexing vs. dictionary lookup. * Experimental results from a - [polyfill prototype](https://github.com/WebAssembly/polyfill) show that + [polyfill prototype](https://github.com/WebAssembly/polyfill-prototype-1) show that decoding the binary format is about 23× faster than parsing the corresponding asm.js source (using [this demo](https://github.com/lukewagner/AngryBotsPacked), comparing -- cgit v1.2.3