aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm/page_alloc.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* mm/init: fix zone boundary creationOliver O'Halloran2017-06-171-7/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | commit 90cae1fe1c3540f791d5b8e025985fa5e699b2bb upstream. As a part of memory initialisation the architecture passes an array to free_area_init_nodes() which specifies the max PFN of each memory zone. This array is not necessarily monotonic (due to unused zones) so this array is parsed to build monotonic lists of the min and max PFN for each zone. ZONE_MOVABLE is special cased here as its limits are managed by the mm subsystem rather than the architecture. Unfortunately, this special casing is broken when ZONE_MOVABLE is the not the last zone in the zone list. The core of the issue is: if (i == ZONE_MOVABLE) continue; arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[i] = arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[i-1]; As ZONE_MOVABLE is skipped the lowest_possible_pfn of the next zone will be set to zero. This patch fixes this bug by adding explicitly tracking where the next zone should start rather than relying on the contents arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[]. Thie is low priority. To get bitten by this you need to enable a zone that appears after ZONE_MOVABLE in the zone_type enum. As far as I can tell this means running a kernel with ZONE_DEVICE or ZONE_CMA enabled, so I can't see this affecting too many people. I only noticed this because I've been fiddling with ZONE_DEVICE on powerpc and 4.6 broke my test kernel. This bug, in conjunction with the changes in Taku Izumi's kernelcore=mirror patch (d91749c1dda71) and powerpc being the odd architecture which initialises max_zone_pfn[] to ~0ul instead of 0 caused all of system memory to be placed into ZONE_DEVICE at boot, followed a panic since device memory cannot be used for kernel allocations. I've already submitted a patch to fix the powerpc specific bits, but I figured this should be fixed too. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462435033-15601-1-git-send-email-oohall@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
* memblock, numa: binary search node idYinghai Lu2017-05-241-10/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current early_pfn_to_nid() on arch that support memblock go over memblock.memory one by one, so will take too many try near the end. We can use existing memblock_search to find the node id for given pfn, that could save some time on bigger system that have many entries memblock.memory array. Here are the timing differences for several machines. In each case with the patch less time was spent in __early_pfn_to_nid(). 3.11-rc5 with patch difference (%) -------- ---------- -------------- UV1: 256 nodes 9TB: 411.66 402.47 -9.19 (2.23%) UV2: 255 nodes 16TB: 1141.02 1138.12 -2.90 (0.25%) UV2: 64 nodes 2TB: 128.15 126.53 -1.62 (1.26%) UV2: 32 nodes 2TB: 121.87 121.07 -0.80 (0.66%) Time in seconds. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
* mm: disable zone_reclaim_mode by defaultMel Gorman2017-05-241-2/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware and it's routine to see major performance degradation due to zone_reclaim_mode being enabled but relatively few can identify the problem. Those that require zone_reclaim_mode are likely to be able to detect when it needs to be enabled and tune appropriately so lets have a sensible default for the bulk of users. This patch (of 2): zone_reclaim_mode causes processes to prefer reclaiming memory from local node instead of spilling over to other nodes. This made sense initially when NUMA machines were almost exclusively HPC and the workload was partitioned into nodes. The NUMA penalties were sufficiently high to justify reclaiming the memory. On current machines and workloads it is often the case that zone_reclaim_mode destroys performance but not all users know how to detect this. Favour the common case and disable it by default. Users that are sophisticated enough to know they need zone_reclaim_mode will detect it. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Pranav Vashi <neobuddy89@gmail.com>
* topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback nodeJoonsoo Kim2016-09-281-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Anton noticed (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg67489.html) that on ppc LPARs with memoryless nodes, a large amount of memory was consumed by slabs and was marked unreclaimable. He tracked it down to slab deactivations in the SLUB core when we allocate remotely, leading to poor efficiency always when memoryless nodes are present. After much discussion, Joonsoo provided a few patches that help significantly. They don't resolve the problem altogether: - memory hotplug still needs testing, that is when a memoryless node becomes memory-ful, we want to dtrt - there are other reasons for going off-node than memoryless nodes, e.g., fully exhausted local nodes Neither case is resolved with this series, but I don't think that should block their acceptance, as they can be explored/resolved with follow-on patches. The series consists of: [1/3] topology: add support for node_to_mem_node() to determine the fallback node [2/3] slub: fallback to node_to_mem_node() node if allocating on memoryless node - Joonsoo's patches to cache the nearest node with memory for each NUMA node [3/3] Partial revert of 81c98869faa5 (""kthread: ensure locality of task_struct allocations") - At Tejun's request, keep the knowledge of memoryless node fallback to the allocator core. This patch (of 3): We need to determine the fallback node in slub allocator if the allocation target node is memoryless node. Without it, the SLUB wrongly select the node which has no memory and can't use a partial slab, because of node mismatch. Introduced function, node_to_mem_node(X), will return a node Y with memory that has the nearest distance. If X is memoryless node, it will return nearest distance node, but, if X is normal node, it will return itself. We will use this function in following patch to determine the fallback node. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Han Pingtian <hanpt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: W4TCH0UT <ateekujjawal@gmail.com>
* mm: pass readahead info down to the i/o schedulerLee Susman2016-08-261-0/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some i/o schedulers (i.e. row-iosched, cfq-iosched) deploy an idling algorithm in order to be better synced with the readahead algorithm. Idling is a prediction algorithm for incoming read requests. In this patch we mark pages which are part of a readahead window, by setting a newly introduced flag. With this flag, the i/o scheduler can identify a request which is associated with a readahead page. This enables the i/o scheduler's idling mechanism to be en-sync with the readahead mechanism and, in turn, can increase read throughput. Change-Id: I0654f23315b6d19d71bcc9cc029c6b281a44b196 Signed-off-by: Lee Susman <lsusman@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Stefan Guendhoer <stefan@guendhoer.com>
* first commitMeizu OpenSource2016-08-151-0/+7661