| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 816b0acf3deb6d6be5d0519b286fdd4bafade905 upstream.
If first_bad == this_sector when we get the WriteMostly disk
in read_balance(), valid disk will be returned with zero
max_sectors. It'll lead to a dead loop in make_request(), and
OOM will happen because of endless allocation of struct bio.
Since we can't get data from this disk in this case, so
continue for another disk.
Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <fangwei1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 203d27b0226a05202438ddb39ef0ef1acb14a759 upstream.
This was introduced with 9e882242c6193ae6f416f2d8d8db0d9126bd996b
which changed the return value of submit_bio_wait() to return != 0 on
error, but didn't update the caller accordingly.
Fixes: 9e882242c6 ("block: Add submit_bio_wait(), remove from md")
Reported-by: Bill Kuzeja <William.Kuzeja@stratus.com>
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Guendhoer <stefan@guendhoer.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
inconsistencies
commit 423f04d63cf421ea436bcc5be02543d549ce4b28 upstream.
raid1_end_read_request() assumes that the In_sync bits are consistent
with the ->degaded count.
raid1_spare_active updates the In_sync bit before the ->degraded count
and so exposes an inconsistency, as does error()
So extend the spinlock in raid1_spare_active() and error() to hide those
inconsistencies.
This should probably be part of
Commit: 34cab6f42003 ("md/raid1: fix test for 'was read error from
last working device'.")
as it addresses the same issue. It fixes the same bug and should go
to -stable for same reasons.
Fixes: 76073054c95b ("md/raid1: clean up read_balance.")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Guendhoer <stefan@guendhoer.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
commit 34cab6f42003cb06f48f86a86652984dec338ae9 upstream.
When we get a read error from the last working device, we don't
try to repair it, and don't fail the device. We simple report a
read error to the caller.
However the current test for 'is this the last working device' is
wrong.
When there is only one fully working device, it assumes that a
non-faulty device is that device. However a spare which is rebuilding
would be non-faulty but so not the only working device.
So change the test from "!Faulty" to "In_sync". If ->degraded says
there is only one fully working device and this device is in_sync,
this must be the one.
This bug has existed since we allowed read_balance to read from
a recovering spare in v3.0
Reported-and-tested-by: Alexander Lyakas <alex.bolshoy@gmail.com>
Fixes: 76073054c95b ("md/raid1: clean up read_balance.")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Guendhoer <stefan@guendhoer.com>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
