xavi/android_kernel_m2note/crypto/Makefile, branch ng-7.1.2

UPSTREAM: crypto: chacha20 - Add a generic ChaCha20 stream cipher implementation

2017-12-14T13:59:50+00:00

ChaCha20 is a high speed 256-bit key size stream cipher algorithm designed by Daniel J. Bernstein. It is further specified in RFC7539 for use in IETF protocols as a building block for the ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD. This is a portable C implementation without any architecture specific optimizations. It uses a 16-byte IV, which includes the 12-byte ChaCha20 nonce prepended by the initial block counter. Some algorithms require an explicit counter value, for example the mentioned AEAD construction. Signed-off-by: Martin Willi Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu (cherry picked from commit c08d0e647305c3f8f640010a56c9e4bafb9488d3) Change-Id: I5892b1451e46f915c0ed8e711bdded9e6f4a4aae Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers

crypto: more robust crypto_memneq

2017-08-31T11:39:26+00:00

Disabling compiler optimizations can be fragile, since a new optimization could be added to -O0 or -Os that breaks the assumptions the code is making. Instead of disabling compiler optimizations, use a dummy inline assembly (based on RELOC_HIDE) to block the problematic kinds of optimization, while still allowing other optimizations to be applied to the code. The dummy inline assembly is added after every OR, and has the accumulator variable as its input and output. The compiler is forced to assume that the dummy inline assembly could both depend on the accumulator variable and change the accumulator variable, so it is forced to compute the value correctly before the inline assembly, and cannot assume anything about its value after the inline assembly. This change should be enough to make crypto_memneq work correctly (with data-independent timing) even if it is inlined at its call sites. That can be done later in a followup patch. Compile-tested on x86_64. Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu

UPSTREAM: crypto: crypto_memneq - add equality testing of memory regions w/o timing leaks

2017-08-24T13:52:58+00:00

(cherry pick from commit 5fd53819a37e243f368376d70260873448b83df8 in 3.10.y) commit 6bf37e5aa90f18baf5acf4874bca505dd667c37f upstream. When comparing MAC hashes, AEAD authentication tags, or other hash values in the context of authentication or integrity checking, it is important not to leak timing information to a potential attacker, i.e. when communication happens over a network. Bytewise memory comparisons (such as memcmp) are usually optimized so that they return a nonzero value as soon as a mismatch is found. E.g, on x86_64/i5 for 512 bytes this can be ~50 cyc for a full mismatch and up to ~850 cyc for a full match (cold). This early-return behavior can leak timing information as a side channel, allowing an attacker to iteratively guess the correct result. This patch adds a new method crypto_memneq ("memory not equal to each other") to the crypto API that compares memory areas of the same length in roughly "constant time" (cache misses could change the timing, but since they don't reveal information about the content of the strings being compared, they are effectively benign). Iow, best and worst case behaviour take the same amount of time to complete (in contrast to memcmp). Note that crypto_memneq (unlike memcmp) can only be used to test for equality or inequality, NOT for lexicographical order. This, however, is not an issue for its use-cases within the crypto API. We tried to locate all of the places in the crypto API where memcmp was being used for authentication or integrity checking, and convert them over to crypto_memneq. crypto_memneq is declared noinline, placed in its own source file, and compiled with optimizations that might increase code size disabled ("Os") because a smart compiler (or LTO) might notice that the return value is always compared against zero/nonzero, and might then reintroduce the same early-return optimization that we are trying to avoid. Using #pragma or __attribute__ optimization annotations of the code for disabling optimization was avoided as it seems to be considered broken or unmaintained for long time in GCC [1]. Therefore, we work around that by specifying the compile flag for memneq.o directly in the Makefile. We found that this seems to be most appropriate. As we use ("Os"), this patch also provides a loop-free "fast-path" for frequently used 16 byte digests. Similarly to kernel library string functions, leave an option for future even further optimized architecture specific assembler implementations. This was a joint work of James Yonan and Daniel Borkmann. Also thanks for feedback from Florian Weimer on this and earlier proposals [2]. [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00211.html [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/10/131 Signed-off-by: James Yonan Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Florian Weimer Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan

crypto: improve gcc optimization flags for serpent and wp512

2017-07-04T09:51:40+00:00

commit 7d6e9105026788c497f0ab32fa16c82f4ab5ff61 upstream. An ancient gcc bug (first reported in 2003) has apparently resurfaced on MIPS, where kernelci.org reports an overly large stack frame in the whirlpool hash algorithm: crypto/wp512.c:987:1: warning: the frame size of 1112 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] With some testing in different configurations, I'm seeing large variations in stack frames size up to 1500 bytes for what should have around 300 bytes at most. I also checked the reference implementation, which is essentially the same code but also comes with some test and benchmarking infrastructure. It seems that recent compiler versions on at least arm, arm64 and powerpc have a partial fix for this problem, but enabling "-fsched-pressure", but even with that fix they suffer from the issue to a certain degree. Some testing on arm64 shows that the time needed to hash a given amount of data is roughly proportional to the stack frame size here, which makes sense given that the wp512 implementation is doing lots of loads for table lookups, and the problem with the overly large stack is a result of doing a lot more loads and stores for spilled registers (as seen from inspecting the object code). Disabling -fschedule-insns consistently fixes the problem for wp512, in my collection of cross-compilers, the results are consistently better or identical when comparing the stack sizes in this function, though some architectures (notable x86) have schedule-insns disabled by default. The four columns are: default: -O2 press: -O2 -fsched-pressure nopress: -O2 -fschedule-insns -fno-sched-pressure nosched: -O2 -no-schedule-insns (disables sched-pressure) default press nopress nosched alpha-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1136 848 1136 176 am33_2.0-linux-gcc-4.9.3 2100 2076 2100 2104 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.9.3 848 848 1048 352 cris-linux-gcc-4.9.3 272 272 272 272 frv-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1128 1000 1128 280 hppa64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1128 336 1128 184 hppa-linux-gcc-4.9.3 644 308 644 276 i386-linux-gcc-4.9.3 352 352 352 352 m32r-linux-gcc-4.9.3 720 656 720 268 microblaze-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1108 604 1108 256 mips64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1328 592 1328 208 mips-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1096 624 1096 240 powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1088 432 1088 160 powerpc-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1080 584 1080 224 s390-linux-gcc-4.9.3 456 456 624 360 sh3-linux-gcc-4.9.3 292 292 292 292 sparc64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 992 240 992 208 sparc-linux-gcc-4.9.3 680 592 680 312 x86_64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 224 240 272 224 xtensa-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1152 704 1152 304 aarch64-linux-gcc-7.0.0 224 224 1104 208 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7.0.1 824 824 1048 352 mips-linux-gcc-7.0.0 1120 648 1120 272 x86_64-linux-gcc-7.0.1 240 240 304 240 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.4.7 840 392 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.5.4 784 728 784 320 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.6.4 736 728 736 304 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.7.4 944 784 944 352 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.8.5 464 464 760 352 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.9.3 848 848 1048 352 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-5.3.1 824 824 1064 336 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-6.1.1 808 808 1056 344 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7.0.1 824 824 1048 352 Trying the same test for serpent-generic, the picture is a bit different, and while -fno-schedule-insns is generally better here than the default, -fsched-pressure wins overall, so I picked that instead. default press nopress nosched alpha-linux-gcc-4.9.3 1392 864 1392 960 am33_2.0-linux-gcc-4.9.3 536 524 536 528 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.9.3 552 552 776 536 cris-linux-gcc-4.9.3 528 528 528 528 frv-linux-gcc-4.9.3 536 400 536 504 hppa64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 524 208 524 480 hppa-linux-gcc-4.9.3 768 472 768 508 i386-linux-gcc-4.9.3 564 564 564 564 m32r-linux-gcc-4.9.3 712 576 712 532 microblaze-linux-gcc-4.9.3 724 392 724 512 mips64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 720 384 720 496 mips-linux-gcc-4.9.3 728 384 728 496 powerpc64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 704 304 704 480 powerpc-linux-gcc-4.9.3 704 296 704 480 s390-linux-gcc-4.9.3 560 560 592 536 sh3-linux-gcc-4.9.3 540 540 540 540 sparc64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 544 352 544 496 sparc-linux-gcc-4.9.3 544 344 544 496 x86_64-linux-gcc-4.9.3 528 536 576 528 xtensa-linux-gcc-4.9.3 752 544 752 544 aarch64-linux-gcc-7.0.0 432 432 656 480 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7.0.1 616 616 808 536 mips-linux-gcc-7.0.0 720 464 720 488 x86_64-linux-gcc-7.0.1 536 528 600 536 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.4.7 592 440 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.5.4 776 448 776 544 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.6.4 776 448 776 544 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.7.4 768 448 768 544 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.8.5 488 488 776 544 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.9.3 552 552 776 536 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-5.3.1 552 552 776 536 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-6.1.1 560 560 776 536 arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-7.0.1 616 616 808 536 I did not do any runtime tests with serpent, so it is possible that stack frame size does not directly correlate with runtime performance here and it actually makes things worse, but it's more likely to help here, and the reduced stack frame size is probably enough reason to apply the patch, especially given that the crypto code is often used in deep call chains. Link: https://kernelci.org/build/id/58797d7559b5149efdf6c3a9/logs/ Link: http://www.larc.usp.br/~pbarreto/WhirlpoolPage.html Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79149 Cc: Ralf Baechle Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau

crypto: add lz4 Cryptographic API

2017-04-11T08:57:16+00:00

Add support for lz4 and lz4hc compression algorithm using the lib/lz4/* codebase. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix warnings] Signed-off-by: Chanho Min Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Bob Pearson Cc: Richard Weinberger Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: Yann Collet Cc: Kyungsik Lee Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

first commit

2016-08-15T02:19:42+00:00